Use Case: Moon Misconception Clinic。主题:Differentiated Visuals、教育科普、Misconception Repair、Moon Misconception Clinic、Moon Phase、Science Lesson、Teacher Resource、Use Case。

如何复用

可参考这个示例来设计 Differentiated Visuals、教育科普、Misconception Repair、Moon Misconception Clinic 工作流、提示词结构、视觉约束和结果检查方式。

了解 Drill 打开 VibeArt

完整提示词

Create one polished public-gallery concept image titled exactly "Use Case: Moon Misconception Clinic".

Use case: educational visual production workflow / teacher resource design / science misconception repair.
Asset type: landscape 16:9 teacher resource production sheet for a GPT Image 2 use-case gallery.

Primary request: Show GPT Image 2 being used to transform one fictional middle-school astronomy lesson idea into a reviewable set of visual supports. The image must feel like a teacher-facing production artifact, not a classroom portrait, not a dashboard, not a map, not a menu, not public signage, not a chart-fact-checking board, not a comic strip, and not a tabletop object.

Fictional lesson only: "Why the Moon looks different each week". Keep the science simplified and non-authoritative; show the teacher review process, not a definitive textbook page.

Composition: a clean horizontal production sheet with five connected zones arranged as a flowing lesson path, not a grid. Zone 1 is "Hook" with a simple night-sky thumbnail and the phrase "Same Moon". Zone 2 is "Common Guess" with a faded incorrect shadow idea marked "CHECK". Zone 3 is "Model" with a simple Earth-Moon-Sun relationship diagram using abstract circles and arrows. Zone 4 is "Explain Back" with two short caption cards: "I notice" and "I think". Zone 5 is "Teacher Review" with concise QA chips: "clear model", "no magic shadow", "plain words", "print ready". Add a small side rail labeled "Versions" with three compact chips: "quick sketch", "poster", "low-ink".

Visual style: refined education-design studio artifact, warm white paper, graphite text, midnight blue sky accent, soft amber moon highlights, teal review chips, coral correction marks. Use crisp vector-like illustration mixed with subtle paper texture. Keep all readable text short, aligned, and professionally spaced. The image should demonstrate that image generation can produce differentiated lesson visuals plus a human misconception review layer.

Safety and originality constraints: fictional school material only; no real students, no real teachers, no faces, no real school names, no brands, no logos, no public figures, no politics/elections/parties, no medical/legal claims, no hazardous instructions, no adult or explicit content, no gore, no celebrity likeness, no copyrighted characters, no living-artist style imitation. Do not copy any external prompt, classroom image, article figure, product UI, source image, artwork, chart, or protected style.

更多示例